LingVo.club
📖+40 XP
🎧+25 XP
+45 XP
Rethinking 'the Human' in AI — Level B2 — the letters are made up of different colors

Rethinking 'the Human' in AICEFR B2

16 Apr 2026

Adapted from Guest Contributor, Global Voices CC BY 3.0

Photo by Steve A Johnson, Unsplash

Level B2 – Upper-intermediate
5 min
297 words

Xonorika Kira argues that debates about whether to “centre the human” in AI often hide a narrow template of humanity that has excluded many forms of intelligence. She links this template to a long history in which animal, ecological, ancestral and spiritual knowledges were dismissed, and she says that idea has been shaped by white supremacy, patriarchy, ableism and cisheteronormativity. The border between the natural and the artificial, she adds, creates moral rules that mark some bodies and genders as “unnatural,” which can reinforce exclusion.

Kira connects these ideas to recent shifts in computation. The global tech ecosystem has automated many creative and affective tasks, and since at least 2022 the acceleration of planetary computation has intensified fears of replacement—not just of jobs but of meaning, perception and creativity. At a book launch for "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" at Now Instant in Los Angeles, she described efforts to reclaim technology and cultural data that were extracted without consent; an art critic and a curator debated whether this change redeems production contexts and noted that queer and decolonial artists broadened the conversation.

She stresses that data and content come from labour, extraction and energy: models run on servers that draw electricity, water and minerals. Her practical paths are concrete: build smaller, situated datasets grounded in relationships, consent and accountability; imagine alternate forms of data consumption—smaller, slower models tuned to communities and interfaces that invite depth rather than endless scale; and treat AI systems as unstable collaborators that can support cultural sovereignty. Following Ruha Benjamin, Kira says imagination must accompany dismantling.

Kira Xonorika is an interdisciplinary artist, researcher and writer. Their work examines trauma and colonial power, pathologisation, trans and queer temporalities, knowledge production from the Global South, internet aesthetics and resilient organising.

Difficult words

  • templatea fixed plan or model used repeatedly
  • ancestralrelating to ancestors or family history
  • cisheteronormativitybelief that cisgender, heterosexual identities are normal
  • extractionprocess of removing resources or data from something
  • situatedplaced in a specific context or environment
  • sovereigntythe right to control and govern oneself or a group
  • pathologisationtreating a behaviour or condition as a disease
  • temporalitythe way time is experienced or organised
    temporalities

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • Do you think smaller, situated datasets based on consent could reduce harm from AI? Why or why not?
  • How might treating AI as an "unstable collaborator" help support cultural sovereignty in a community?
  • Which kinds of knowledge (for example ancestral or ecological) would you like to see included in AI, and how could that change outcomes?

Related articles

AI tools in Indian courts — Level B2
5 Dec 2025

AI tools in Indian courts

Indian courts are using AI for transcripts, research and translation while they face a backlog of several tens of millions of cases. The government and the Supreme Court plan modernization but judges and experts warn of risks.

How words shape the debate about AI — Level B2
16 Apr 2026

How words shape the debate about AI

The release of ChatGPT in November 2022 changed public debate about AI, and the topic remains central in 2026. Experts say the language used to describe models creates confusion and call for clearer words focused on safety and rights.