Sleep affects daily life, but many common ideas about sleep are unclear or incomplete. Kimberly Fenn is a professor in the psychology department at Michigan State University. She has studied public misunderstandings about sleep and tries to make the science easier to understand.
Fenn identifies common misconceptions and offers guidance to improve sleep quality. Her work explains basic facts and practical steps rather than reporting a single new study. The material appears in an online post called "How can you get the best sleep?" on Futurity. People are encouraged to read the full breakdown and, if needed, consult health or sleep specialists.
Difficult words
- affect — have an influence on daily lifeaffects
- misconception — a wrong idea many people havemisconceptions
- guidance — advice to help someone do something
- practical — useful in everyday life or work
- consult — talk with an expert for help or advice
- specialist — a person with professional knowledge in a fieldspecialists
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Do you think sleep affects your daily life? Why or why not?
- Would you read an online post about sleep or talk to a specialist? Which would you choose and why?
Related articles
Antibiotics on farms and rising resistance in East Africa
Antibiotic use on farms in parts of East Africa is increasing antimicrobial resistance. Poor access to veterinary care, weak rules and routine drug use on animals are driving resistant infections that affect people, animals and the environment.
El Salvador expands AI telemedicine with DoctorSV
El Salvador has promoted AI to modernize public services and launched DoctorSV, a telemedicine app that began in 2025 and entered a second phase in April 2026. Supporters praise it, while medical workers and privacy experts raise concerns.
Study finds Abbott-Bioline malaria test gives many false negatives
A study on the Thailand–Myanmar border found the Abbott-Bioline rapid malaria test missed many infections. Researchers call it “not fit for purpose”; WHO and the manufacturer are reviewing the test and further studies are under way.