LingVo.club
📖+40 XP
🎧+25 XP
+45 XP
Study finds many “clean” products for textured hair still risky — Level B2 — two white and black labeled bottles

Study finds many “clean” products for textured hair still riskyCEFR B2

21 Apr 2026

Adapted from Sean Barton-Sheffield, Futurity CC BY 4.0

Photo by Nick Scott, Unsplash

Level B2 – Upper-intermediate
6 min
339 words

The study evaluates whether the growing "clean beauty" movement actually delivers safer options for people who use textured-hair products. Led by UC Santa Barbara and Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health with partners Black Women for Wellness and Silent Spring Institute, the research used a Target store in South Los Angeles as a field case. The team web-scraped ingredient lists for 150 products labeled "Target Clean" and assessed them against the Environmental Working Group Skin Deep database to measure potential human-health hazards.

Findings showed a wide spectrum from relatively safe to highly hazardous formulations, with the majority clustering in a moderate-hazard range. As lead author Joaquín Madrid Larrañaga noted, the label "clean" often functions as marketing rather than a safety guarantee. The analysis flagged that 70% of products listed "fragrance" or "parfum", a term that can conceal a mix of undisclosed chemicals. Only 41% of the sampled products matched entries in the EWG database; of those, over 90% received moderate hazard scores (3–6).

Labeling problems were also apparent: 14.6% of products contained sulfates, yet roughly half of items carried the retailer's "Formulated without Sulfates" badge, producing inconsistent information for shoppers. The focus on textured hair matters because these products are used disproportionately by women of color, who already face higher exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Coauthor Lariah Edwards warned that Black women may still encounter toxic ingredients when choosing "clean" products, and Janette Robinson-Flint of Black Women for Wellness urged enforceable regulation.

Senior author Bhavna Shamasunder emphasized that the issue goes beyond retailer policy to manufacturing practices and gaps in federal regulation. Until clear federal standards exist, the researchers advise avoiding fragrances/parfum, sulfates, parabens and phthalates. Additional coauthors are affiliated with UC Santa Barbara, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Silent Spring Institute and Black Women for Wellness. The work received support from the Rose Foundation Consumer Products Funding Board, the California Breast Cancer Research Program, the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, the Passport Foundation and the Forsythia Foundation.

Difficult words

  • formulationthe complete mixture of ingredients in a product
    formulations
  • fragrancean ingredient added to give a pleasant scent
  • parfuma label word for added scent; often undisclosed chemicals
  • sulfatea cleaning chemical used to remove oils and dirt
    sulfates
  • parabena preservative used to stop bacteria and mold growth
    parabens
  • phthalatea chemical used to make plastics more flexible
    phthalates
  • endocrine-disruptingable to interfere with the body's hormone systems

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • How might inconsistent 'clean' labeling affect shoppers, especially women of color?
  • What steps could retailers take to make 'clean' product claims more trustworthy for consumers?
  • Do you think federal regulation should set a single standard for 'clean' products? Why or why not?

Related articles