New research from the University of Texas at Austin shows that human hair can serve as a detailed record of chemical exposure over days, weeks and months. Because hair grows slowly, different sections correspond to different times, allowing researchers to reconstruct exposure timelines that blood or urine tests miss.
Anna Neville began by testing a lock of her own hair in Pawel Misztal's indoor air chemistry class. Heating intact strands released embedded molecules that a proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer — the lab "sniffer" — identified in real time. Unlike conventional hair analysis that requires grinding and chemical extraction, this approach scans intact strands and speeds detection with less sample preparation.
Analyzing donated hair bundles, the team detected more than 1,000 compounds, including phthalates and residues from cigarette smoke. The study, now published in Chemical Research in Toxicology, notes that much exposure happens indoors; Americans spend about 90% of their time inside and indoor sources often dominate the pollutants people inhale. Pilot funding came from Whole Communities–Whole Health, a UT grand challenge research program.
- Practical steps to reduce exposure include vacuuming more often.
- Avoid personal care products that contain phthalates.
- Open windows briefly to flush indoor air.
Researchers stress practical engineering solutions to improve indoor air quality rather than alarm. The method offers a new way to study how everyday environments relate to long-term chemical exposure.
Difficult words
- exposure — contact with a chemical or harmful substance
- reconstruct — build a past sequence from available data
- phthalate — chemical used in plastics and personal carephthalates
- residue — small amount left after a processresidues
- detection — finding or discovering something present
- conventional — usual or traditional not new
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- What are the benefits and possible limits of using hair to study long-term chemical exposure?
- Which practical steps from the article could you easily adopt at home, and why?
- Do you see any privacy or ethical concerns with using hair as a record of chemical exposure? Explain.
Related articles
Pet care at One Health Clinic helps youth get medical care
A study found that youth experiencing homelessness were more likely to receive medical care when clinics also offered veterinary care for their pets. The research looked at clients of the One Health Clinic in downtown Seattle and records from 2019–2022.
Cleaner air in East Asia linked to faster global warming
A study in Nature Communications, Earth and Environment finds recent reductions in aerosol pollution across East Asia, especially China, have probably contributed to faster global surface warming since about 2010. Experts say urgent cuts to emissions and more adaptation finance are needed.
Traditional African Diet Reduces Inflammation
A trial in Tanzania found that a traditional plant-based African diet lowered inflammation within two weeks, while a short-term Western diet increased inflammation and weakened immune responses. The results matter for rising non-communicable diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Study: Whale shark tourism rules broken at El Azul
A study using drone footage found many tourism rule violations at El Azul, a large whale shark site off the Yucatán coast. Researchers recorded boats and swimmers too close to feeding sharks and recommend better monitoring and self-regulation.