An expert from Syracuse University says synthetic food dyes are common in many foods. Examples include Red Dye 40, Yellow 5 and 6, and Red Dye 3. Manufacturers add these petroleum-based colorings so products look more appealing.
The expert says dyes are not toxic immediately, but the main worry is long-term effects on children's development and behaviour. Research finds a genetic component, and some countries have banned these ingredients.
Major companies now have until 2027-28 to phase these ingredients out following FDA guidance. Removing color may make companies add more sugar and fat. Consumers should pay attention to overall diet quality and watch sugar, saturated fat, protein and fibre.
Difficult words
- synthetic — made by people, not by nature
- petroleum-based — made from oil or fossil fuels
- toxic — can make people or animals very sick
- development — process of growth and learning in children
- behaviour — ways a person acts or responds
- genetic — from a person's genes or family
- phase — to do something in stages over time
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Do you check food labels for synthetic food dyes? Why or why not?
- Which parts of the diet should people watch, like sugar or fat?
- Do you think removing colour but adding more sugar is a good idea? Why?
Related articles
Cell transplant may help heart after spinal cord injury
Researchers tested transplanting immature nerve cells into spinal cord injuries in rats. The transplants improved nerve control of circulation — stabilizing resting blood pressure and lowering heart rate — but hormonal responses after injury still rose.
Demand for clean-energy minerals harms poor regions
A UN report warns that rising global demand for minerals for clean energy is causing environmental damage, water loss and health harms in poorer mining regions, while richer countries gain most benefits. The report urges reforms to protect water and people.
Study finds Abbott-Bioline malaria test gives many false negatives
A study on the Thailand–Myanmar border found the Abbott-Bioline rapid malaria test missed many infections. Researchers call it “not fit for purpose”; WHO and the manufacturer are reviewing the test and further studies are under way.