LingVo.club
📖+20 XP
🎧+15 XP
+25 XP
Abu Dhabi meeting between Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders (Level A2) — Russian and ukrainian flags on a table

Abu Dhabi meeting between Armenian and Azerbaijani leadersCEFR A2

17 Jul 2025

Level A2 – High beginner / Elementary
2 min
91 words

On July 10 the leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia met in Abu Dhabi. It was their first unmediated bilateral contact. Both leaders said that direct talks were the most efficient way to address normalization and the terms of a peace deal agreed in principle in March.

Officials said the talks covered border delimitation, the proposed Zangezur corridor and the initialing of a peace agreement. The background includes fighting in the early 1990s, a 1994 ceasefire, the 2020 war and a 2023 military operation that left Azerbaijan in full control of Karabakh.

Difficult words

  • bilateralinvolving two countries or two people
  • unmediatedwithout a third person or group
  • normalizationreturn to normal relations between the countries
  • delimitationthe act of deciding or marking borders
  • corridora narrow route or passage between places
  • ceasefirean agreement to stop fighting for a time

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • Do you think direct talks between leaders can help make peace? Why?
  • Why are border delimitation talks important after fighting?
  • How important is it to have a ceasefire before making a peace agreement?

Related articles

Hebron seed bank bulldozed (Level A2)
7 Aug 2025

Hebron seed bank bulldozed

On July 31, 2025 Israeli forces bulldozed the UAWC seed‑multiplication unit in Hebron, destroying a living archive that held over 70 indigenous heirloom varieties. The loss was called a direct blow to Palestinian biodiversity and food sovereignty.

How Dobbs reshaped US politics (Level A2)
15 Jun 2026

How Dobbs reshaped US politics

The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs changed rules about abortion and affected women’s access to health care. A new book uses many surveys to show how the ruling changed voters, public opinion, and trust in institutions.