On 18 September the US government published the America First Global Health Strategy. The document says global health should advance American safety, prosperity and influence. It also criticises current programmes as "inefficient and wasteful" and says they created a culture of dependency.
The strategy will focus on stopping infectious outbreaks before they reach US soil, strengthening bilateral ties, and promoting American health innovation. It asks low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to co-invest and meet performance benchmarks before some funds are released. Experts say these conditions could be punitive if countries cannot raise domestic spending.
The article notes PEPFAR has saved more than 26 million lives since 2003, and private donors gave US$110 million to keep projects running after earlier funding problems.
Difficult words
- strategy — a plan to achieve a goal.health strategy
- government — the group that makes rules for a country.
- affect — to change or influence something.
- funding — money provided for a project or program.
- dependency — reliance on something else for support.
- partnerships — working together with others for a common goal.new partnerships
- progress — forward movement towards a goal or better state.health progress
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Why is continued funding important for low-income countries?
- What are the risks of dependency on US aid?
- How can partnerships be beneficial in health strategies?
Related articles
Internet use may reduce loneliness for older unpaid caregivers
A US study found that older unpaid caregivers who use the internet more often tend to feel less lonely. Researchers analysed 2019–2020 California survey data from 3,957 caregivers aged 65 and older; about 12% had health problems.
AI and Wearable Devices for Type 2 Diabetes
A meta-review from the University at Buffalo examines AI-enhanced wearable devices for Type 2 diabetes and prediabetes. The study finds predictive benefits and important limits, and calls for larger, more transparent studies before routine clinical use.
Do low‑calorie sweeteners affect blood sugar and health?
Researchers reviewed trials and large studies on non‑nutritive sweeteners and found signals of worse blood sugar control and possible metabolic harm. They note questions about mechanisms, study limits, and a need for more trials.