LingVo.club
Level
Media Coverage of the Vidovdan Protests in Belgrade — Level A2 — a crowd of people standing around a flag

Media Coverage of the Vidovdan Protests in BelgradeCEFR A2

3 Oct 2025

Adapted from International and Security Affairs Centre - ISAC, Global Voices CC BY 3.0

Photo by Stefan Kostić, Unsplash

Level A2 – High beginner / Elementary
3 min
136 words

An analysis by Nataša Stanojević was published by ISAC, part of the Western Balkans Anti-Disinformation Hub, and an edited version was republished by Global Voices. It looks at media coverage and political reactions to large protests on June 28 in Belgrade, held on the national and religious holiday Vidovdan.

Organizers and many people came to call for snap elections, institutional reforms and action against corruption. Pro-government media often framed the protests as a threat and used hostile labels. Some outlets linked the protests to foreign influence or Srebrenica, though organisers did not say this. Independent media, human rights groups and the Council of Europe reported that most of the protest was peaceful. After police intervention there were arrests, detentions and reports of physical abuse. The analysis warns these tactics can damage democracy and trust.

Difficult words

  • protestA public demonstration against something.
    protested, protests
  • governmentThe group of people who control a country.
  • mediaWays to communicate information to the public.
  • coverThe way news is reported or presented.
    coverage
  • publicPeople in a community or society.
  • democracyA system where people vote to choose leaders.

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • Why do you think the government called protesters blockaders?
  • How can media influence public opinion during a protest?
  • What are some ways people can peacefully protest?

Related articles

AI risks for LGBTQ+ communities — Level A2
18 Nov 2025

AI risks for LGBTQ+ communities

A global survey found 55 percent of people see more benefits than drawbacks from AI. But LGBTQ+ communities face bias, harmful images, automatic gender recognition and biometric monitoring, and advocates call for stronger safeguards.