The United States Water Withdrawals Database, created by Landon Marston and doctoral student Yunus Naseri at Virginia Tech, compiles publicly available records of water withdrawn from rivers, lakes and underground aquifers. Published alongside a study in Nature Scientific Data, the database standardizes records gathered with the cooperation of all 50 state agencies and direct data collection from 42 states; some records extend back more than a century.
The dataset contains large quantities of standardized entries: counts of unique water users, points of diversion and use, tens of millions of withdrawal volumes and millions of individual records. It focuses on self‑supplied withdrawals—water drawn directly from a source by power plants, mines, public systems and others—and includes groundwater and surface water with monthly and annual data where available. It does not record deliveries to individual households or businesses.
Coverage is uneven: the database is not a full census of every drop, and only about a quarter of reported withdrawals are directly measured with meters; most are estimates or mixed methods, and each record documents how the data were obtained. The resource follows FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) and aims to help communities and policymakers track seasonal changes, compare sectors and plan conservation and sustainable management.
- Agricultural irrigation represents about half of recorded entries.
- The power sector withdraws the largest total volume each year.
- Records and reporting rules vary by state.
Difficult words
- withdrawal — act of taking water from a sourcewithdrawals
- aquifer — layer of rock or soil that holds wateraquifers
- standardize — make different data follow the same formatstandardizes
- interoperable — able to work with other systems or data
- groundwater — water that is found under the ground
- census — complete count or survey of a population
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- How could local communities or policymakers use this database to improve water conservation plans?
- What issues might arise when many withdrawal records are estimates rather than meter measurements?
- Why are FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) important for a public data resource like this?
Related articles
AI expands sexual and reproductive health access in Latin America
Research groups in Peru and Argentina use AI tools to give sexual and reproductive health information to young and marginalised people. Experts praise potential but warn of bias and call for better data, rules and oversight.
Study: Whale shark tourism rules broken at El Azul
A study using drone footage found many tourism rule violations at El Azul, a large whale shark site off the Yucatán coast. Researchers recorded boats and swimmers too close to feeding sharks and recommend better monitoring and self-regulation.
Researchers Call for Clear Rules on Gene-Edited Crops in Mexico
Mexican researchers want rules that distinguish gene-edited crops from GMOs. They launched a petition asking the government for evidence-based regulation while warning a March decree banning genetically modified maize could also affect gene editing.