Kendo scoring relies heavily on human judgment. Judges, called shinpan, decide if a strike meets ki-ken-tai no icchi — the unity of spirit, sword and body. For a point referees expect correct timing, a strong kiai (shout), proper footwork and full body commitment.
Complaints about inconsistent calls are common. Kendo Mirai Kenkyujo noted that slow-motion replay can show some awarded strikes did not hit target areas. On social media some say older referees or top schools can influence decisions. A practitioner, @kendo358, argued that some complaints come from misunderstanding standards and urged clearer fundamentals.
The current three-person referee system (sanshinsei) was introduced in modern Japan to reduce bias. Debate continues about using video replay and sensors; supporters want objective evidence, while opponents worry technology could weaken kendo’s spiritual and educational aims.
Difficult words
- judgment — decision by a person about an action
- judge — person who decides about actions in a matchJudges
- kiai — loud shout used by a kendo player
- footwork — movement of the feet while fighting
- commitment — strong personal effort and full participation
- influence — power to change a decision or result
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Do you think video replay would make kendo fairer? Why or why not?
- How could referees keep decisions consistent without more technology? Give one or two ideas.
- Is spiritual or educational value important in sports you know? Give an example and explain.
Related articles
Light tool measures activity inside living brain cells
Researchers developed a bioluminescent calcium sensor called CaBLAM to record activity inside living brain cells without external light. The tool works in mice and zebrafish and enables long recordings that avoid damage from bright light.
