Kendo scoring relies heavily on human judgment. Judges, called shinpan, decide if a strike meets ki-ken-tai no icchi — the unity of spirit, sword and body. For a point referees expect correct timing, a strong kiai (shout), proper footwork and full body commitment.
Complaints about inconsistent calls are common. Kendo Mirai Kenkyujo noted that slow-motion replay can show some awarded strikes did not hit target areas. On social media some say older referees or top schools can influence decisions. A practitioner, @kendo358, argued that some complaints come from misunderstanding standards and urged clearer fundamentals.
The current three-person referee system (sanshinsei) was introduced in modern Japan to reduce bias. Debate continues about using video replay and sensors; supporters want objective evidence, while opponents worry technology could weaken kendo’s spiritual and educational aims.
Difficult words
- judgment — decision by a person about an action
- judge — person who decides about actions in a matchJudges
- kiai — loud shout used by a kendo player
- footwork — movement of the feet while fighting
- commitment — strong personal effort and full participation
- influence — power to change a decision or result
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Do you think video replay would make kendo fairer? Why or why not?
- How could referees keep decisions consistent without more technology? Give one or two ideas.
- Is spiritual or educational value important in sports you know? Give an example and explain.
Related articles
Ecuador teams build tech to fight election disinformation
A revived Hacks Hackers chapter in Ecuador held a February conference and a hackathon to tackle electoral disinformation. Three winning teams — Goddard, VeritasAI and PillMind — received prizes, mentoring and support to develop prototypes.
