LingVo.club
Level
Brazil decriminalizes small amounts of marijuana — Level B1 — text

Brazil decriminalizes small amounts of marijuanaCEFR B1

14 Nov 2024

Adapted from Isabela Carvalho, Global Voices CC BY 3.0

Photo by Pedro Céu, Unsplash

Level B1 – Intermediate
3 min
151 words

In June 2024 Brazil’s Supreme Court approved a ruling that treats possession of up to 40 grams of marijuana, or six female plants, as personal use. The decision aims to help courts and police distinguish trafficking from personal consumption. Consumption itself remains illegal, but penalties are administrative rather than criminal, and police should not arrest someone for small amounts.

The court president said the ruling can be applied retroactively when it benefits the defendant. In August the Superior Court of Justice applied the precedent and acquitted a person who had been imprisoned for possessing 23 grams.

Law 11.343 from 2006 had distinguished users from traffickers but gave no clear criteria, and judges and police sometimes relied on subjective factors. Research shows sizable use in the population and suggests decriminalization could modestly reduce the prison population and public spending. NGOs welcomed the ruling but called for better education, support programs and regulation.

Difficult words

  • possessionhaving something under your control or ownership
  • distinguishsee or show the difference between things
  • traffickingillegal trade or movement of goods or people
  • consumptionthe act of using or taking a substance
  • retroactivelyapplied to events or cases in the past
  • acquitfind legally not guilty of a crime
    acquitted
  • precedentearlier decision used as a legal example
  • decriminalizationremoval of criminal penalties for an action
  • administrativerelated to government management or rules

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • Do you agree that police should not arrest people for small amounts? Why or why not?
  • How could education and support programs help people, as NGOs suggested?
  • Should the ruling be applied retroactively to benefit defendants? Give your reasons.

Related articles