- Brazil's Supreme Court changed the marijuana rules in June.
- Small amounts are now seen as personal use only.
- Using marijuana is still illegal but not criminal.
- Penalties will be administrative, such as fines or warnings.
- Police can stop people with small amounts, not arrest.
- The change could help reduce prison overcrowding and violence.
- Some civil groups welcomed the clearer rules and guidance.
- People say more education and support are needed now.
Difficult words
- marijuana — a drug made from a plant used by people
- personal use — use by one person, not for selling
- illegal — not allowed by the law
- criminal — relating to crimes or punishable by law
- penalty — a punishment, for example a fine or warningPenalties
- administrative — made or done by government offices
- overcrowding — too many people in one place
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Do you think people need more education now?
- Would you prefer a fine or a warning?
- Do you think this change can reduce prison overcrowding?
Related articles
Virtual diet and exercise program helps people with lymphoma
A study tested a virtual diet and exercise program for people getting chemotherapy for lymphoma. The program improved symptoms, attendance was high, and participants had better strength and physical performance during treatment.
Violence in West Asia and the threat to international law
Violence across Gaza, Lebanon and Iran has raised warnings that international law is eroding. Attacks on civilians, infrastructure and humanitarian personnel, plus harsh political rhetoric, worry critics about a dangerous new precedent.
African leaders urged to fix health financing at UNGA80
At the 80th UN General Assembly in New York, Obinna Ebirim urges African countries to press for fairer donor partnerships and to increase domestic health funding. He highlights staff shortages, weak infrastructure and the National Health Fellows Programme.
Study finds Abbott-Bioline malaria test gives many false negatives
A study on the Thailand–Myanmar border found the Abbott-Bioline rapid malaria test missed many infections. Researchers call it “not fit for purpose”; WHO and the manufacturer are reviewing the test and further studies are under way.