Big tech links make farming tools costly ^{CEFR B2}

A report published on 25 February by the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (IPES-Food) argues that a close alliance between large agricultural corporations and big technology firms is reshaping modern farming in ways that disadvantage smallholder farmers. Head In The Cloud describes how companies such as Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Alibaba use cloud platforms and artificial intelligence to attract public and private investment, which in turn steers research, funding and policy priorities.

Lim Li Ching, co-chair of IPES-Food and lead author, calls these developments "deeply political" and says they create technological lock-ins. Once farmers adopt proprietary digital systems, leaving those systems can mean losing access to their data and tools. The report adds that many of these technologies are expensive, energy- and resource-intensive, and depend on continuous connectivity and subscription models that most smallholders cannot afford.

Authors list high-cost technologies that tend to favour large farms: precision agriculture services, satellite monitoring, automated livestock systems and digital platforms built on Big Tech cloud infrastructure. They explain that control of data and algorithms lets a small number of companies influence what is planted, how crops are grown and who benefits. Surveillance of soils, seeds and farming practices produces data used to sell products, train AI and generate profit with limited transparency, and the report raises concerns about the commercialisation (biopiracy) of traditional and Indigenous knowledge and genetic resources with little benefit for source communities.

Some named companies did not respond to requests for comment; a Bayer spokesperson said digitalisation is essential for research and climate action and that farmers remain free to choose technologies. The report highlights farmer-driven initiatives, including the Farmers' Seed Network in China and the AGUAPAN initiative in Peru, which has conserved the genetic diversity of over 1,000 native potato varieties. Authors argue that scaling such systems requires long-term public and private funding, extension services, public infrastructure and stronger data governance. Emmanuel Siakilo of the African Union Commission echoes the need for context-specific investment and questions whether current funding supports the right kinds of agricultural adaptation. The piece was produced by SciDev.Net’s Global desk.