LingVo.club
Level
PFAS in Water Harm Babies and Cost Society — Level B1 — A baby being washed in a kitchen sink

PFAS in Water Harm Babies and Cost SocietyCEFR B1

18 Dec 2025

Adapted from U. Arizona, Futurity CC BY 4.0

Photo by Julia Michelle, Unsplash

Level B1 – Intermediate
3 min
164 words

Researchers led by the University of Arizona published results in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. They studied every birth in New Hampshire from 2010–2019 and compared mothers receiving water from wells downstream of PFAS-contaminated sites with similar mothers using upstream wells. The downstream group showed higher first-year infant mortality, more preterm births (including births before 28 weeks), and more very low birth weights (including below 2.2 pounds).

The study concentrates on long-chain PFAS, PFOA and PFOS, which are no longer made in the U.S. but remain in soil and leach into groundwater. Extrapolating to the contiguous United States, the authors estimate social costs of at least $8 billion a year for babies born each year. These costs cover medical care, long-term health effects and reduced lifetime earnings.

The researchers say cleanup, regulation and point-of-use filters could yield important health and economic benefits, and they note that activated carbon filters can remove long-chain PFAS.

Difficult words

  • downstreamIn the direction water flows from a site
  • upstreamIn the opposite direction of water flow
    upstream wells
  • infant mortalityNumber of babies who die in infancy
    first-year infant mortality
  • preterm birthBirth that happens before full pregnancy term
    preterm births
  • birth weightHow much a baby weighs at birth
    very low birth weights
  • groundwaterWater that exists under the earth's surface
  • extrapolateTo estimate results for a larger area
    Extrapolating
  • social costTotal economic harm to society from an event
    social costs

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • Which of the study's suggested actions (cleanup, regulation, or point-of-use filters) would you support to reduce PFAS in drinking water, and why?
  • How might long-term health effects and reduced lifetime earnings change the choices a family makes?
  • If you lived near a PFAS-contaminated site, what steps would you take about your well water and why?

Related articles

Marburg outbreak in Kigali, Rwanda — Level B1
6 Feb 2025

Marburg outbreak in Kigali, Rwanda

In July 2024 Rwanda detected its first Marburg outbreak in Kigali, starting among health workers. Authorities and the WHO led a fast response with genomic tests and treatments; most confirmed cases recovered and the outbreak ended in November.

PFAS in Water Harm Babies and Cost Society — English Level B1 | LingVo.club