LingVo.club
Level
Hunting linked to more female wild turkey chicks — Level A2 — Three turkeys walk across a sunlit grassy hill.

Hunting linked to more female wild turkey chicksCEFR A2

28 Dec 2025

Adapted from Savannah Peat - U. Georgia, Futurity CC BY 4.0

Photo by Spencer DeMera, Unsplash

Level A2 – High beginner / Elementary
2 min
115 words

Researchers monitored hundreds of male and female turkeys, their nests and young across sites in Georgia, South Carolina and Louisiana over three years. They compared places with active hunting to places where hunting was uncommon.

In hunted areas about half of the male turkeys survived, while at non-hunted sites 83% of males survived. The study found that offspring sex ratios differed: where hunting was uncommon the ratio was balanced, but in hunted areas many more chicks were female — roughly two-thirds instead of half.

The researchers suggest that hunting may raise stress for females during egg-laying or change female choices about mates, and that these effects could matter for turkey populations and management.

Difficult words

  • monitorwatch something for information over time
    monitored
  • survivekeep living after an injury or danger
    survived
  • offspringyoung animals or children of a parent
  • sex rationumber of males compared to females
    sex ratios
  • huntsearch for and kill wild animals
    hunted
  • stressstrong feeling of worry or mental pressure

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • Do you think hunting should be limited to help turkey populations? Why or why not?
  • Why might stress during egg-laying change the sexes of chicks?
  • Have you seen wild turkeys or other wild birds near your home? Describe briefly.

Related articles

UNESCO report finds gaps in education data — Level A2
1 May 2022

UNESCO report finds gaps in education data

A UNESCO report published on 27 April finds important gaps in education data from poorer countries. It reviewed primary and secondary data in 120 countries but under‑represented low‑income nations and found no science assessment data in low‑income countries.