Mariana Tamari and Joana Varon, working with Coding Rights for the Tramas Project, examine how AI, automation and digital tools reshape land use in Brazil. They show how modern agribusiness combines Big Tech, Big Agro and financial interests into a highly digitalised farming model often presented as "precision agriculture." This model uses sensors, remote monitoring, automated fleets and predictive AI to promise control and efficiency.
In practice, the study finds, the approach displaces people, reduces agricultural diversity and replaces traditional, empirical knowledge with data-driven decisions. Digital systems such as rural land registries can overlay historical occupations and make collective territories invisible. When databases do not erase communities, drones and agrochemicals have been used to intimidate small farms.
The researchers call for rejecting technological neutrality, demanding transparency and decentralised governance of AI systems. They urge public infrastructures that enable collective participation and the protection of social territories, and they value regenerative, agro-ecological and ancestral practices.
Difficult words
- agribusiness — Large businesses involved in industrial farming
- precision agriculture — Farming using sensors and technology for accuracy
- displace — To move people away from their usual landdisplaces
- diversity — Different kinds of crops or farming methods
- empirical — Based on observation and experience, not theory
- data-driven — Based on analysis of collected digital information
- transparency — Open sharing of information and clear processes
- decentralised governance — Decision-making shared among many local organisations
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- How might replacing empirical knowledge with data-driven decisions affect small farmers?
- What kinds of public infrastructure could help communities take part in decisions about land and AI?
- Do you think precision agriculture can be changed to protect local communities? Why or why not?
Related articles
Pressure on Kibira National Park from tea farms and development
Tea plantations and other development near Kibira National Park in northwest Burundi have reduced forest cover and made wildlife, including chimpanzees, rarer. Experts and local people call for community action to protect the park.
Electric car batteries can power homes and cut costs
A University of Michigan study finds that using electric vehicle batteries to power homes (vehicle-to-home, V2H) can save owners thousands of dollars and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Results differ across regions and the technology is still being tested.
Media Coverage of the Vidovdan Protests in Belgrade
An analysis by Nataša Stanojević, published by ISAC and republished by Global Voices, examines media and political reactions to the large June 28 Vidovdan protests in Belgrade and highlights arrests, media framing, and risks to democracy.
Sudan turns to AI as health system struggles
Sudan’s health system is under severe strain after an almost two‑year civil war. A senior health official says the country is using artificial intelligence to help provide care where normal services no longer reach, while shortages and attacks worsen the crisis.