The Chepang Landscape is a large area in Nepal that the government has proposed as an OECM, a kind of conserved place. Local Chepang people manage many small forests on the hills.
The landscape supports wild fruit, medicinal plants and many birds. It also links to a nearby national park and helps animals move between forests. People are concerned about land ownership and about rules that could stop traditional practices. Officials and community groups need to talk and agree on fair rules and benefits.
Difficult words
- manage — to take care of and control something
- conserve — to protect and keep things for the futureconserved
- support — to help or give what is neededsupports
- ownership — the legal right to own land or things
- traditional — from older local customs and practices
- benefit — something that helps people or communitiesbenefits
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Why should officials and community groups talk before making rules?
- What fair benefits could help local Chepang people?
- Do you think it is important to link small forests to a national park? Why or why not?
Related articles
Guanacaste: water, tourism and development
Guanacaste is Costa Rica's driest province and attracts tourists and foreign buyers. Rapid coastal development has increased water shortages, pollution and local protests, while officials and studies warn aquifers and ageing water systems are under pressure.
Local climate adaptation must be central to African planning
A new study warns that locally led climate adaptation must be part of national planning in Africa. It says efforts are fragmented, underfunded and often driven by external priorities, and highlights agriculture and early warning systems.
Courts and the right to a healthy environment in Pakistan
Pakistan’s courts have recognised a constitutional right to a healthy environment through landmark cases and a new amendment. Legal advances face many limits, including weak civil society support, funding problems and gaps in judicial expertise.
