LingVo.club
Level
Chepang Landscape proposed as an OECM in Nepal — Level B1 — A scenic view of a mountain range with trees in the foreground

Chepang Landscape proposed as an OECM in NepalCEFR B1

30 Dec 2025

Level B1 – Intermediate
3 min
139 words

Nepal has proposed the Chepang Landscape as an OECM to recognise lands managed by the Indigenous Chepang community. According to the 2021 census, the Chepang population is over 84,300. The community manages about 300 hectares of forest across six hills, locally called the Danda.

The landscape contains wild fruits, medicinal herbs and many bird species. Parts of it are sacred and some areas are protected by local beliefs. The site also acts as a corridor linking Chitwan National Park and surrounding forests, helping species such as tigers, leopards and Asian elephants to move.

The proposed OECM would cover 13,479 hectares across Makawanpur, Chitwan and Dhading. Governance is shared between the community forest users and the divisional forest office. Concerns include unclear land ownership and possible impacts on traditional practices. Stakeholder consultation with the Chepang and local organisations is essential.

Difficult words

  • proposeto offer or suggest a plan or idea
    proposed
  • manageto control or care for land or resources
    managed, manages
  • indigenouspeople or groups native to a place
  • hectarea unit of land area equal to 10,000 square metres
    hectares
  • corridora route that links habitats for animal movement
  • governancethe system for rules and decision making
  • stakeholdera person or group with an interest in a project
  • ownershiplegal right to possess or use property or land

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • How could recognising the Chepang lands as an OECM help the local community? Explain briefly.
  • What problems might unclear land ownership create for managing the landscape?
  • Do you think local beliefs and sacred areas should be part of conservation decisions? Why or why not?

Related articles