The new analysis, published in JAMA Network Open, explores whether genetic differences in the vitamin D receptor explain why some people benefit from supplements while others do not. It re-examined data from the D2d trial, a large multi-site study that compared 4,000 units of vitamin D per day with placebo in more than 2,000 US adults who had prediabetes. The original trial found no clear benefit for the whole group.
Researchers analyzed genetic information from 2,098 participants who consented to DNA testing and compared outcomes by subgroups defined by three common variations in the VDR gene. The analysis found that adults with the AA variation of the ApaI VDR gene—about 30% of participants—did not respond to daily high-dose vitamin D, whereas adults with AC or CC variations had a significantly reduced risk of developing diabetes when taking the high dose. Overall, the report noted a 19% lower risk in the subgroup with certain VDR variations who took vitamin D.
Biological reasons could explain these differences: vitamin D is converted in the body to an active form that binds the VDR protein, and insulin-producing cells in the pancreas have VDRs, which suggests vitamin D might influence insulin release and blood sugar control. The authors say this points toward a more personalized approach to preventing type 2 diabetes, but they warn against taking high doses without medical advice. Current guidelines recommend 600 IU per day for people ages 1 to 70 and 800 IU per day for those older than 70, and too much vitamin D has been linked to increased risk of falls and fractures in older adults. More research is needed to identify who could benefit from higher daily doses.
Difficult words
- analysis — detailed study of data or information
- variation — a difference or alternative form within a groupvariations
- placebo — inactive substance given instead of medicine
- subgroup — a smaller group within a larger study groupsubgroups
- convert — change into a different form or stateconverted
- bind — attach firmly, often by physical or chemical actionbinds
- guideline — official advice about what people should doguidelines
- prediabetes — higher than normal blood sugar before diabetes
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- How could testing for VDR variations change advice about vitamin D supplements for individuals?
- What risks mentioned in the article should clinicians consider before recommending high daily doses of vitamin D?
- What kinds of further research would help identify who might benefit from higher daily vitamin D doses?
Related articles
How social media in China shapes eating disorders
Online communities on platforms like Xiaohongshu use codes and posts that normalise strict eating and extreme thinness. Research shows more Chinese teenagers now show signs of eating disorders and experts say removal of posts is not enough.
Nepal’s cement industry: growth, jobs and pollution
After the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal expanded cement production with large investments, especially from Chinese firms. By 2019 it became self-sufficient and started exports to India in July 2022, while social and environmental problems grew.
AI tool helps local autism diagnosis in Missouri
Researchers at the University of Missouri tested the FDA-approved CanvasDx, an AI device, to help primary care evaluate autism where specialty centres are far away. In a study it gave determinate results for 52% of 80 children and matched clinicians' diagnoses.
