The new analysis, published in JAMA Network Open, explores whether genetic differences in the vitamin D receptor explain why some people benefit from supplements while others do not. It re-examined data from the D2d trial, a large multi-site study that compared 4,000 units of vitamin D per day with placebo in more than 2,000 US adults who had prediabetes. The original trial found no clear benefit for the whole group.
Researchers analyzed genetic information from 2,098 participants who consented to DNA testing and compared outcomes by subgroups defined by three common variations in the VDR gene. The analysis found that adults with the AA variation of the ApaI VDR gene—about 30% of participants—did not respond to daily high-dose vitamin D, whereas adults with AC or CC variations had a significantly reduced risk of developing diabetes when taking the high dose. Overall, the report noted a 19% lower risk in the subgroup with certain VDR variations who took vitamin D.
Biological reasons could explain these differences: vitamin D is converted in the body to an active form that binds the VDR protein, and insulin-producing cells in the pancreas have VDRs, which suggests vitamin D might influence insulin release and blood sugar control. The authors say this points toward a more personalized approach to preventing type 2 diabetes, but they warn against taking high doses without medical advice. Current guidelines recommend 600 IU per day for people ages 1 to 70 and 800 IU per day for those older than 70, and too much vitamin D has been linked to increased risk of falls and fractures in older adults. More research is needed to identify who could benefit from higher daily doses.
Difficult words
- analysis — detailed study of data or information
- variation — a difference or alternative form within a groupvariations
- placebo — inactive substance given instead of medicine
- subgroup — a smaller group within a larger study groupsubgroups
- convert — change into a different form or stateconverted
- bind — attach firmly, often by physical or chemical actionbinds
- guideline — official advice about what people should doguidelines
- prediabetes — higher than normal blood sugar before diabetes
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- How could testing for VDR variations change advice about vitamin D supplements for individuals?
- What risks mentioned in the article should clinicians consider before recommending high daily doses of vitamin D?
- What kinds of further research would help identify who might benefit from higher daily vitamin D doses?
Related articles
Gagandeep Kang on Vaccines, Surveillance and Child Health in India
Gagandeep Kang, a leading expert on enteric diseases, urges India to prepare tools to prevent viral outbreaks. She helped develop indigenous rotavirus vaccines, built surveillance networks and now works at the Gates Foundation.
Virtual diet and exercise program helps people with lymphoma
A study tested a virtual diet and exercise program for people getting chemotherapy for lymphoma. The program improved symptoms, attendance was high, and participants had better strength and physical performance during treatment.
Parents' Attitudes Linked to Binge Drinking and Greek Life
A study finds that parents who are more permissive about alcohol are linked to students joining fraternities or sororities and higher binge drinking during the first college year. Authors suggest parenting programs to reduce risk.
Nepal’s cement industry: growth, jobs and pollution
After the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal expanded cement production with large investments, especially from Chinese firms. By 2019 it became self-sufficient and started exports to India in July 2022, while social and environmental problems grew.