LingVo.club
📖+20 XP
🎧+15 XP
+25 XP
Heat and Young Children’s Development (Level A2) — A young boy looking out of a window

Heat and Young Children’s DevelopmentCEFR A2

9 Dec 2025

Adapted from Jade McClain-NYU, Futurity CC BY 4.0

Photo by martin platonov, Unsplash

Level A2 – High beginner / Elementary
2 min
113 words

Researchers examined data for three- and four-year-old children in six countries, including Gambia, Georgia, Madagascar, Malawi, Palestine and Sierra Leone. They matched each child’s development records to monthly average temperature data to estimate heat exposure.

The study used the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) and data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) for 2017–2020. The ECDI measures literacy and numeracy, social-emotional development, approaches to learning, and physical development.

The team found that higher temperatures were linked to lower rates of literacy and numeracy milestone attainment. The negative effects were stronger for children from poorer households, for households with less clean water, and for children living in urban areas.

Difficult words

  • developmentprocess of growing or learning in childhood
  • temperaturehow hot or cold the air is
  • exposuretime spent near something harmful or risky
  • literacyability to read and write simple texts
  • numeracyability to understand and use numbers
  • householdpeople who live together in one home
    households

Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.

Discussion questions

  • Do you think high temperatures can affect young children where you live? Why or why not?
  • What changes could help protect children from heat in your community?
  • Have you seen children find it harder to learn when it is very hot? Describe one example.

Related articles

UNESCO report finds gaps in education data (Level A2)
1 May 2022

UNESCO report finds gaps in education data

A UNESCO report published on 27 April finds important gaps in education data from poorer countries. It reviewed primary and secondary data in 120 countries but under‑represented low‑income nations and found no science assessment data in low‑income countries.