The new analysis examines Neoselachii, the clade that contains modern sharks and rays, across a 145-million-year fossil record. The team compiled over 20,000 fossil entries and, using recent analytical methods, reconstructed the estimated times of origin and extinction for about 1,500 species. Their goal was to find pulses of diversification and loss and to explain those patterns.
The main finding is consistent and strong: species face a much higher extinction risk during their first four million years of existence than later on. This young-species vulnerability appears throughout the entire 145-million-year span and applies regardless of the cause of extinction. The study documents expected losses at the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, around 66 million years ago, and also reveals previously unknown events. One striking episode about 30 million years ago led to many extinctions but almost no subsequent rise in new species.
The data further suggest that over the past 40–50 million years too few new species have arisen to replace earlier losses. The authors therefore argue that species' age is a persistent predictor of extinction risk over evolutionary time. They add that modern sharks and rays are survivors of many past losses and gains, but they now face additional pressure from human activities. The paper appears in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, and the source is the University of Zurich.
Difficult words
- clade — group of related species with common ancestry
- fossil record — all fossils that show past life and history
- reconstruct — build an estimate of past events or datesreconstructed
- diversification — process when new species form and increase diversity
- extinction — end of a species when no individuals remain
- vulnerability — state of being especially likely to be harmed
- mass extinction — a global event causing many species to die
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- What consequences might follow if too few new species arise to replace earlier losses, especially for sharks and rays? Give reasons or examples.
- How could human activities increase pressure on sharks and rays, given the study’s finding about young-species vulnerability?
- Should conservation focus more on protecting young species or older, established species? Explain your view with reasons from the article.
Related articles
Jaw membrane in ancient Thrinaxodon may be an early eardrum
Researchers used CT scans and engineering simulations on a Thrinaxodon fossil. Their models show a membrane in the jaw could work as an eardrum, pushing the origin of sensitive mammal hearing back by nearly 50 million years.
Early eukaryotes lived on ancient seafloor
Researchers studied microfossils from the McArthur and Birrindudu basins in Northern Territory, Australia, dated 1.75–1.4 billion years ago. The fossils occur mainly in oxygenated seafloor sediments, suggesting early eukaryotes needed oxygen and lived on the seafloor.
Indigenous groups at COP30 demand forest protection and rights
At COP30 in Belém, Brazil, indigenous peoples and local communities asked for stronger protection of tropical forests, recognition of territorial rights, and direct access to climate finance. A GATC and Earth Insight report maps where extractive industries threaten forests and people.