Documentary on Igor Kon wins Artdocfest prizeCEFR B2
16 Apr 2025
Adapted from Daria Dergacheva, Global Voices • CC BY 3.0
Photo by yasmin peyman, Unsplash
“Why I Swam Against the Current,” a new documentary about Igor Kon, won the best director prize at Artdocfest in March 2025. The film was made by the Berlin-based studio Narra together with the independent journalist cooperative Bereg and was released on Meduza's YouTube channel.
Igor Kon was born in 1928 in Saint Petersburg. He grew up mainly with his mother while his father barely participated in his life, and he survived evacuation during the Siege of Leningrad. At 15 he began studying history, first at Chuvashiya State Pedagogical University and later in Saint Petersburg (then Leningrad) after his return. Kon worked in the social sciences during a period of strong political limits in the Soviet Union, changing jobs and facing periods of unemployment; as a person of Jewish origin he also experienced discrimination that at times limited his opportunities.
By the mid-1980s Kon was widely known as the first and for many years the only sexologist in the USSR. He regularly appeared in the media, drew on foreign academic literature, and contributed to public policy on AIDS as the epidemic reached the late USSR. Protocols for treating HIV were in place in Russia since 1990, and treatment with foreign effective drugs was available for free before the invasion of Ukraine started in 2022. The Soviet film Little Vera (1988) showed a modest sex scene and was watched by 55 million people; homosexuality was removed from the list of criminal offences in 1993.
In the 1990s Kon researched homosexuality and in the early 2000s explored gender roles. During the Putin era he faced hostility from state and church actors: the documentary shows a 30 January 2001 lecture at Moscow State University where firecrackers were set off, offensive posters were unfurled and someone threw a pie at him; a week later a fake bomb was left at his door and he received death threats. In 2002 Orthodox activists published a pamphlet accusing him of supporting LGBTQ+ people. Kon died in 2011; his ashes were buried secretly in the same grave as his mother to prevent vandalism. Director Igor Sadreev said: "Igor Kon did not hide from reality behind his desk, but changed it to the best of his ability. He spoke on the most painful and taboo subjects, and stood up for the most vulnerable members of society. In essence, this film is about scientific courage, moral responsibility, and inner freedom."
Difficult words
- documentary — film that records real events or people
- evacuation — moving people away from danger to safety
- discrimination — unfair treatment based on group characteristics
- sexologist — a professional who studies human sexual behaviour
- epidemic — a disease that spreads quickly among many people
- vandalism — deliberate damage or destruction of property
- taboo — an action or topic considered unacceptable socially
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- How did the political and social attitudes described in the article affect Kon's work and personal safety?
- The article mentions changes such as AIDS protocols and removing homosexuality from criminal offences. How can experts and media influence such social or legal changes?
- The director describes the film as about scientific courage, moral responsibility, and inner freedom. Do you agree with this summary based on the article? Explain your view with reasons.
Related articles
Nigeria restores English as medium of instruction
The Federal Government reversed the 2022 National Language Policy and restored English as the sole medium of instruction from pre-primary to tertiary. The November 2025 decision has prompted strong debate among educators, linguists and cultural groups.
Targeting inflammation as a way to treat depression
A federally funded review and meta-analysis found that anti-inflammatory treatments reduced depressive symptoms and eased anhedonia in people with depression who had high inflammation. The drugs were not FDA-approved for depression and would be used off-label.