A new international study led by ETH Zurich together with the WSL research institute and the Vrije Universiteit Brussel estimates how many glaciers may remain to 2100 and when each glacier is likely to disappear. Rather than focusing only on ice mass, the research counts glaciers and models the timing of their loss. The authors call the year with the highest annual loss the "Peak Glacier Extinction."
The results show the Alps could reach their peak loss rate as early as 2033–2041. Globally, the peak is about ten years later and could rise from roughly 2,000 to 4,000 glaciers lost per year. At +1.5° C the peak would be around 2041 with about 2,000 glaciers vanishing in one year; at +4° C the peak moves to about 2055 and rises to around 4,000.
Scenario results for the Alps are stark: if current policies lead to +2.7° C, only about 110 glaciers would remain in Central Europe by 2100 (about 3% of today’s total); at +4° C that number falls to around 20. Under the Paris target of +1.5° C about 12% (roughly 430 of about 3,000 in 2025) would remain, and at +2° C around 8% (ca. 270) would survive. Globally, roughly 100,000 glaciers would remain at +1.5° C but only about 18,000 at +4° C.
Coauthor Daniel Farinotti says, "The results underline how urgently ambitious climate action is needed." The study notes that complete glacier loss can harm tourism and local culture even if it adds little to sea-level rise. The researchers suggest their timeline can help policymakers, communities, tourism planners and hazard managers prepare. They also support the Global Glacier Casualty List to keep names and stories of lost glaciers, such as Birch and Pizol, alive.
Difficult words
- glacier — Large mass of ice on landglaciers
- estimate — Give an approximate number or judgmentestimates
- peak — Year with the highest annual loss rate
- scenario — A possible future situation or outcome
- remain — Continue to exist or be left
- vanish — Disappear completely so it is no longer presentvanishing
- policy — Plan or course of action by authoritiespolicies
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- How could local communities and hazard managers use a timeline of glacier loss to prepare? Give examples.
- What effects on tourism and local culture might follow if glaciers disappear in a region?
- Do you think keeping names and stories of lost glaciers is important? Why or why not?
Related articles
Glacial Lakes and Flood Risk in the Hindu Kush–Himalaya
The Hindu Kush–Himalaya is losing ice and forming more glacial lakes. These lakes can feed rivers but also cause Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs), threatening millions of people, villages and infrastructure in High Mountain Asia.
Chepang Landscape proposed as an OECM in Nepal
The Government of Nepal has proposed the Chepang Landscape as an Other Effective area-based Conservation Measure (OECM). The area is community-managed and important for biodiversity, but land-rights and cultural concerns must be addressed.
Cleaning plastic can release harmful chemicals
A study from Iowa State University shows some common cleaning methods for recyclable plastic can release phthalates into wash water. Ultrasonic cleaning and detergent with sodium hydroxide released DEHP and DCHP, and reuse of water raised DEHP levels.