Researchers in Mexico ask the government to write clear rules for gene-edited crops. They say tools such as CRISPR-Cas change crop traits faster and more precisely than traditional breeding, so rules should be different from those for GMOs.
Twenty-eight researchers published a statement and launched a petition on Change.org. They want evidence-based regulations that allow gene editing to improve nutritional value and drought tolerance while keeping oversight and controls.
In March President Claudia Sheinbaum signed a decree that bans the cultivation of genetically modified maize. Some researchers worry the decree could be read to include gene-editing methods that do not add foreign genes. Argentina and Chile chose different rules in 2015 and 2017.
Difficult words
- researcher — A person who studies something in detail.Researchers
- gene — A part of a cell that carries information.gene-edited
- crop — A plant grown for food or other uses.crops
- enhance — To make something better or stronger.
- regulation — Rules or laws to control something.
- framework — A basic structure that supports something.
- modify — To change or alter something.modified
- concern — A feeling of worry or interest.concerned
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- Why is it important to have clear rules on gene editing?
- How might gene-edited crops benefit farmers?
- What do you think about regulation in science?
Related articles
Nanotech biosensors for early disease diagnosis
At the 75th Lindau Meeting, South African scientist Jaymi Leigh January presented nanotechnology-based biosensors that detect tiny disease biomarkers for tuberculosis, cancer and viral conditions. She aims to develop affordable, portable diagnostics suited to local health needs in South Africa.
