A study led by researchers at the University of Michigan used NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory to analyse X-ray data from more than 1,600 galaxies gathered over 20-plus years. The sample ranged from galaxies more than ten times the mass of the Milky Way down to dwarf galaxies with masses less than a few percent of our home galaxy. The work appears in The Astrophysical Journal.
Results show a clear difference by mass: roughly 30% of dwarf galaxies likely contain supermassive black holes, while over 90% of massive galaxies similar to the Milky Way show central X-ray sources. Many massive systems display bright X-ray emission at their centres, which signals gas heating as it falls onto a black hole. Galaxies with masses below about 3 billion suns usually lacked such unambiguous X-ray signatures; for comparison, the Milky Way’s mass is about 60 billion suns.
The researchers conclude that two effects explain the shortfall of X-ray detections in small galaxies. First, smaller black holes are expected to accrete less gas and therefore be fainter in X-rays, and the data confirm this trend. Second, faintness alone does not account for the full deficit, so a substantial fraction of low-mass galaxies may genuinely lack central black holes. The pattern favours formation models in which the largest black holes begin large, for example from collapsing massive gas clouds, rather than growing only from smaller stellar remnants. Planned observations with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna in 2035 could provide further tests, although funding uncertainties for large missions may affect follow-up efforts.
Difficult words
- analyse — examine information carefully to find meaning
- accrete — collect mass or gas by gravitational attraction
- shortfall — an amount that is missing or lacking
- unambiguous — clear and not open to different interpretations
- remnant — a small remaining part after most removedremnants
- substantial — large in amount, size or importance
- favour — support or prefer one idea or resultfavours
Tip: hover, focus or tap highlighted words in the article to see quick definitions while you read or listen.
Discussion questions
- The article says funding uncertainties may affect follow-up efforts. How could limited funding change planned observations and tests?
- If many low-mass galaxies genuinely lack central black holes, what consequences might that have for our ideas about galaxy evolution?
- How could future missions like the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna help test the study's conclusions?